The Story-First Framework: How to Plan Your Employer Brand Video

26th February 2026
C
Ciara Haley
Co-Founder and Senior Producer, MHF Creative
26 February 2026

Most employer brand video gets commissioned the wrong way round. A brief arrives. A shoot gets booked. An agency turns up, films for a day, delivers something polished, and everyone moves on. Six months later, nobody is quite sure whether it worked, or what it was actually trying to achieve.

After thirteen years producing employer brand, recruitment and people and culture content, this is the pattern we see most often. And it is why so much employer brand video looks and feels the same, competent, inoffensive, and almost entirely forgettable.

The problem is rarely production quality. Most agencies can produce something that looks decent. The problem is that the content was never built around a specific organisational problem, a specific audience, or a specific outcome. It was built around a brief. And briefs, more often than not, describe a format rather than a goal.

At MHF Creative, we work the other way round. Before we discuss cameras, crew, or concept, we start with the problem the organisation is trying to solve and build the story backwards from there. We call this the Story-First Framework.

This article explains the framework in full: what it is, why it exists, the five mistakes it is designed to prevent, and how each of the four stages works in practice.


What is the MHF Story-First Framework?

The core principle

The MHF Story-First Framework is a four-stage employer brand video production methodology built around organisational truth rather than production convention. It is the approach we apply to every employer brand, recruitment and people and culture video project we produce.

Employer brand video works when it is built around a specific problem, told through real people, shaped around what the audience needs to believe, and planned for distribution before a single shot is framed.

The four stages are:

  1. Define the Problem — what are you actually trying to solve, and why does it matter right now?
  2. Find the Real Voices — real employees, real stories, built around the specific problem
  3. Align the Story — what does the audience need to believe or feel in order to change their behaviour?
  4. Plan Distribution — formats, ratios, hooks and cutdowns decided before production begins

Each stage informs the next. Skip one and the content becomes weaker at every subsequent stage. The framework is not a production checklist. It is a way of thinking about employer brand video that puts organisational purpose ahead of production convention.


Five mistakes the Story-First Framework is designed to prevent

These are the patterns we encounter most frequently, and the ones that are easiest to avoid when a project starts with the right questions.

Starting with the brief rather than the problem "We need an employer brand video" is not a brief. It is a format. A brief should begin with a specific organisational challenge: we are struggling to attract engineers in a competitive market, our leadership team feels distant from the people they manage, our application quality has declined because candidates are arriving with the wrong expectations. The format follows the problem.
Using actors or stock footage Candidates recognise it immediately and it destroys credibility the moment they do. The entire purpose of employer brand video is to communicate what it genuinely feels like to work somewhere. Real employees, filmed well, are always more compelling than polished fiction, not because authenticity is a trend, but because credibility is the only currency employer brand content actually has.
Voiceover instead of real employee voices A professional voiceover reading your employer brand values over B-roll of an open-plan office is not storytelling. It is a corporate announcement. Real people speaking in their own words, lightly guided and never scripted, create the kind of authenticity that moves candidates from curious to confident.
Generic content that could belong to any organisation If your employer brand video could be rebranded for one of your competitors without changing a single frame, it is not employer brand content. It is wallpaper. Specificity is what makes employer brand video credible, the specific projects your engineers work on, the specific way your leadership team communicates, the specific culture that makes your organisation different.
Deciding formats and ratios after the shoot If you need a 16:9 careers page hero film, a 1:1 LinkedIn cut, a 9:16 story version, and a 30-second paid ad with an opening hook, these need to be planned before a single shot is framed. Distribution architecture is a pre-production decision, not a post-production problem.

The four stages in detail

1
Stage One

Define the Problem and Why It Matters Now

Every employer brand video project we take on starts with the same question: what specific problem are you trying to solve, and why has it become urgent right now?

The "why now" matters more than most clients expect. There is almost always a trigger, a hiring crisis in a specific discipline, a culture shift following rapid growth, a leadership team that has become distant from the people they lead, a perception problem in a specific talent market. Understanding the urgency shapes everything about the content: tone, pace, who we film, and what the audience needs to walk away believing.

A practical example: an organisation struggling to attract software engineers in a market where every tech company claims to have a great culture and interesting work. The problem is not that they need a video. The problem is that their EVP is not landing with the specific audience they are trying to reach. The video needs to be built around that specific evaluation, not around a general statement of organisational values.

Questions we ask at this stage
What specific hiring, retention or culture challenge is driving this project?
Why has this become a priority right now, what has changed in the organisation or the market?
Who is the primary audience, external candidates, current employees, or both?
What perception do you need to create, change or reinforce?
What does success look like twelve months from now?
2
Stage Two

Find the Real Voices

Once we understand the problem, we identify the real people whose stories can solve it. Not the most senior people. Not the most polished speakers. The people whose lived experience is most directly relevant to what the audience needs to hear.

If the challenge is attracting engineers, we film the engineers, the projects they work on, the problems they solve, the environment they work in, and why they chose this organisation over the other offers they had at the time. If leadership feels inaccessible, we film the leaders as human beings rather than executives, their thinking, their decisions, the moments that shaped their approach.

We also address the concern that comes up in almost every employer brand project: what happens if these people leave? The answer is to build content systems rather than content that depends on specific individuals. The story belongs to the organisation, not to any single person in it.

How we identify the right contributors
Who has direct experience of the thing the audience most wants to understand?
Who represents the culture authentically, not who looks good on camera?
Which voices will be most credible to the specific audience we are trying to reach?
What mix of seniority, role type and tenure gives the most rounded picture?
3
Stage Three

Align the Story to the Audience's Decision

Every piece of employer brand content is trying to move an audience from one belief to another. Candidates who do not know the organisation need to be made curious. Candidates who are curious need to become confident. Employees who feel disconnected need to feel seen and valued. Leaders who feel distant from their teams need to feel human and accessible again.

The story is never about the organisation. It is always about what the audience needs to believe in order to make a different decision. Every edit, every interview question, every frame of B-roll serves that outcome. Content that ignores this journey produces material that looks good but moves nobody.

How we shape the narrative
What does the target audience currently believe about working here?
What do they need to believe in order to apply, stay, or trust leadership?
What is the single most important thing this film needs to communicate?
What tone, aspirational, honest, human, direct, best serves that message?
What would make this audience think "that is exactly what I was looking for"?
4
Stage Four

Plan Distribution Before Production Begins

Where content lives determines how it needs to be made. A careers page hero film is a different creative challenge to a 15-second paid ad with an opening hook. A LinkedIn organic post behaves differently to a 9:16 Instagram story. Internal communications content for an all-hands presentation is filmed and cut differently to a public-facing recruitment campaign.

We map the full distribution landscape before the camera is ever turned on, which channels, which formats, which ratios, whether paid social requires hook-led cuts, whether internal versions need different framing or a different tone entirely. Every decision made at this stage saves budget in post-production and ensures nothing ends up looking like it was adapted rather than designed.

We deliver the files and hand over completely. Measurement, media buying, and distribution strategy sit with the client's internal team or media agency. But the content is built to perform wherever it is used, because those decisions were made before the shoot, not after it.

What we plan before production
Where does the hero film live, careers page, LinkedIn, internal comms, all of the above?
Do we need paid ad versions with hooks? If so, what length, 15 seconds, 30 seconds, 60 seconds?
What ratios are needed, 16:9, 1:1, 9:16?
Are social cutdowns needed, and should they have captions as standard?
Will this content be used in sales conversations, onboarding, or events presentations?

Why this framework produces better employer brand video

The Story-First Framework does not guarantee exceptional content. No framework does. What it guarantees is that every production decision, who we film, what we ask, how we shoot, how we edit, what we deliver, is connected to a specific organisational problem and a specific audience outcome rather than to production convention or creative preference.

The organisations we work with consistently tell us that the difference between content that works and content that does not is almost never production quality. It is almost always whether the content was built around something real, told through someone believable, and designed to meet the audience at the right moment in their decision-making journey.

That is what the Story-First Framework is built to do.


Free Download
The Story-First Framework PDF

The complete four-stage framework as a designed PDF, including the five common mistakes and the questions we ask on every employer brand project.

Free to download. No email required.
↓ Download PDF
Work with MHF Creative

Ready to build something that actually works?

MHF Creative is a London employer brand video production agency working with HR, Talent Acquisition and Employer Brand teams across the UK. If you have a hiring challenge, a culture gap, or a leadership story that is not landing, a discovery call is a good place to start.

Book a Discovery Call
C
Ciara Haley
Co-Founder and Senior Producer, MHF Creative

Ciara has spent the last six years working with HR, Talent Acquisition and Employer Brand teams across finance, technology and professional services, helping organisations produce employer brand and people and culture video content that attracts the right candidates and aligns internal teams. MHF Creative has been producing corporate and employer brand video for over thirteen years.