Share this article
Diversity and inclusion video content is one of the most difficult briefs in corporate communications. Done well, it feels human, specific and credible. Done badly, it feels staged, performative and counterproductive. The difference is rarely about budget. It is about approach — and understanding when animation is the right tool, and when it is not.
MHF Creative produces recruitment and employer brand video for HR directors, talent acquisition teams and employer brand managers across the UK. DEI content comes up regularly as part of broader EVP and recruitment campaigns. Here is what we have learned about what works.
Most diversity and inclusion video content fails for one of two reasons. Either it is too generic — values and commitments stated at a corporate level with no specificity — or it asks real employees to represent their own identity on camera in a way that places an unfair burden on individuals and often reads as performative to the audience it is trying to reach.
The organisations that get DEI content right treat it the same way they treat any other strategic communications challenge: they start with the audience, define what that audience needs to believe, and choose the format that communicates most credibly.
Who is this for and what do they need to believe after watching it?
If the answer is "potential candidates, and they need to believe our culture is genuinely inclusive" — that requires authentic human storytelling, not animation. If the answer is "all employees globally, and they need to understand what unconscious bias is and how to recognise it" — animation is likely the more effective and more respectful format.
The format should follow the communication objective. Most DEI video problems start with the format being chosen before the objective is clear.
Animation has genuine structural advantages for certain types of diversity and inclusion content. Here is where it consistently outperforms live action.
Animation is one of the most effective formats for training content on topics like unconscious bias, psychological safety and cultural sensitivity. It allows you to show scenarios that would be uncomfortable or impractical to recreate with real people, in a way that is clearly illustrative rather than accusatory. Character-led animation lets viewers observe behaviour from the outside, which builds awareness more effectively than direct instruction. For a consistent message across global teams, animation also ensures everyone receives the same experience regardless of location or language.
Not every employee wants to appear on camera, and asking people to do so as representatives of their background, ability or identity creates an unfair burden. Animation removes that burden entirely. Stories about diverse experiences can be told through characters and narratives that feel authentic without placing any individual in an uncomfortable position. This is particularly relevant for content covering disability, neurodiversity, mental health and other areas where personal disclosure requires significant trust.
A single animation production can be localised through dubbing or subtitles without requiring reshoots. Cultural nuances can be incorporated into characters and scenarios at the design stage. For multinational organisations that need consistent DEI messaging across regions with different languages, contexts and cultural expectations, animation is significantly more scalable and cost-effective than live action filmed content.
Onboarding is one of the highest-impact moments for DEI communication. New starters are forming their impression of the organisation's culture and deciding whether the reality matches what was communicated during recruitment. Animation works well here because it can communicate values and culture consistently, at scale, across every new starter regardless of when or where they join — and it can be updated when values or messaging evolves without a new shoot day.
Animation is not always the right choice. There are contexts where live action is more powerful, and where using animation instead would actually undermine the credibility of the content.
When employees genuinely want to share their experience and the storytelling is human, specific and not representative by design, live action is more powerful than animation. A real person speaking honestly about their experience at an organisation is more credible than a character doing the same thing — provided the content feels genuine rather than staged.
The key word is genuine. A live action DEI film where employees have clearly been selected to represent diversity visually, and are delivering scripted talking points, typically performs worse than no DEI content at all. Candidates and employees are sophisticated audiences and they recognise the difference between authentic storytelling and performative representation.
When senior leaders are communicating the organisation's DEI commitments directly, live action is almost always more credible than animation. Leadership video content about inclusion works because it puts a real person on camera, making a real commitment, that the audience can hold them to. Animation in this context removes the accountability that makes the message land.
For more on how MHF approaches recruitment and employer brand video, including EVP films that communicate culture authentically, see our recruitment video production page.
Here is a practical guide to which format works best for each type of diversity and inclusion content.
For multinational organisations, consistency is one of the hardest things to achieve in DEI communications. Different regions have different cultural contexts, different languages, and sometimes different legal frameworks around what can and cannot be communicated about protected characteristics.
Animation addresses the consistency challenge more effectively than any other format. A single production can be localised through dubbing or subtitles, with cultural adaptations built into characters and scenarios at the design stage. The core message, tone and visual identity remain consistent. The delivery adapts to the audience.
This is significantly more cost-effective than producing separate live action content for each region, and more reliable than using a single English-language live action film in markets where it will not land with the same cultural resonance.
For more on animation production for global content, including format requirements, localisation and what to prepare before briefing an agency, see our B2B animation guide.
MHF Creative produces employer brand, recruitment and internal communications video for HR directors and employer brand teams across the UK. A 30-minute discovery call will give you a clear recommendation on approach and format before any budget is committed.
Share this article
